You are here:
Social media buttons

driver i740 intel graphics card

User
  • 8.2
  • Good
  • 154
Softonic
  • 8.8
  • Excellent
  • Excellent
License:
Free
Language:
English
OS:
Win 2000/XP/Vista/7/8
Latest version:
10.20 5/4/11
Last month's downloads:
270
Size:
23 MB
Publisher: :
Miles1977

Similar files

dazzle 50 driver
download driver i740 intel graphics card
Size: 35 MB; Added on May 18, 2013, 04:16; Downloads: 6,253

a driver is installed that causes
download driver i740 intel graphics card
Size: 46 MB; Added on December 10, 2012, 20:34; Downloads: 8,722

vsam odbc driver
download driver i740 intel graphics card
Size: 55 MB; Added on May 12, 2013, 05:08; Downloads: 4,478

8860dn printer drivers
download driver i740 intel graphics card
Size: 73 MB; Added on September 30, 2012, 01:24; Downloads: 6,466

cybiko extreme driver
download driver i740 intel graphics card
Size: 36 MB; Added on February 17, 2013, 05:02; Downloads: 1,347

obtaining a california drivers license
download driver i740 intel graphics card
Size: 31 MB; Added on December 29, 2012, 11:04; Downloads: 3,284

image writer printer driver
download driver i740 intel graphics card
Size: 27 MB; Added on May 12, 2013, 09:04; Downloads: 2,298

TESTED VIRUS FREE - driver i740 intel graphics card

driver i740 intel graphics card is virus-free!

We've analyzed the latest version of driver i740 intel graphics card with 30 antivirus engines and found that it’s virus-free.

Download driver i740 intel graphics card

User reviews driver i740 intel graphics card

  • September 25, 2012, 22:24 | Posted by Collin1989

    i had the same problem of nemo not starting on windows xp machine. i installed the library files and it started working.i think the interface needs work. it should display the search box by default when you open the program just like ava find as primarily searching is the intended goal of this program.also, there are too many options/buttons that it confusing to understand.
  • January 15, 2013, 20:34 | Posted by Raymond1979

    a little slow? the about box took about 10 seconds to open on my system, which isn't a dinosaur quite yet.the whole thing is ugly and hard to use. and when i opened an sxc file i've been using in openoffice.org for, oh, about 2 years without a problem, dates and other data wasn't appearing correctly.free or not, i'll pass.
  • January 16, 2013, 09:45 | Posted by Buddy1989

    not a fan of this branch. the original line worked fine up and until bonk 1016, but things started to get unstable after that, and then they decided to start this "fork" project, and it all went downhill from there.first, there should be a clear feature and capability comparison between what bonk 1016 had and what this "fork" offers, so people know if they are losing any features, and also know what new / unique / modified features to test for stability and functionality.second, the download size is more than double that of bonk 1016. what are you giving us for that double size? anything worth having?what is this "fork" trying to be? are you an encoder and converter? are you a music library? are you a video download program? what the heck are you trying to accomplish with this?also, development is so sluggish it's almost stagnant. you've been left in the dust by lots of other programs that do much of what you are trying to do and they do it a whole lot better.throw onto the pile all of those bugs going on and you have a product not even worth trying.skip this "fork" and go with the standard program instead.
  • March 30, 2013, 17:14 | Posted by Marcus1979

    first, imgburn is not overly complicated. at install and first launch, you get a very clear and concise dialog asking what kind of project you'd like to complete; be it burn an image to disk, or create one etc. it does have the more complicated features for disk mastering for more advanced users, but they're not required as the defaults have never failed me regardless of the task i wish to perform.second, burnaware, while an ok type of app, falls short in some of its functionality and abilty, but can't be totally ignored because it is, after all, free.plumber should focus on a more intelligent and lucid explanation as to why he thinks one program beats another, and leave the passion out of it. slamming other people for their own beliefs simply because they don't fall in line with yours is immature and closed minded. rating a program high because the authors included adding it into the context menu or because they're a friend of yours is simply ridiculous. what other folks are mentioning here is simply this:when you compare this program to others, it doesn't do anything more than the others do besides that context menu thing. i, for one, don't care much about that since i prefer to get into the program itself and do the disk mastering myself. that being said, considering that the other programs are free and this one is not, i would go with the others, and between those two mentioned, imgburn is by far the more powerful and comprehensive. now i did give this program a fair shake and tried it, and quite frankly i am very not impressed with it. it's burner software. it works. so it gets a 3. does it work better? no, so it doesn't get an extra point which would have been a 4. when comparing apples to apples, is it free also? no, there goes the other point that could have brought it up to a 5. so to be clear, it works, but it's not free or as powerful as other free ones, it gets a 3.also, one other thing... take note of the image. right above this program's dialog for burning an image to disk, is windows built in ability to burn an image to disk, which is also (ahem) free. so is one really expected to pay to do something that can be done in literally the same step for free?and i don't know any of the authors to any of the programs.
  • September 30, 2012, 07:40 | Posted by Richard1975

    i haven't been able to run canary or betas since december. it worked fine, then one day canary wouldn't load pages anymore. i've read a lot of forums, some peeps have the same problem, some don't. perplexing.
  • January 25, 2013, 00:27 | Posted by Justin1987

    another clone but ok.
  • April 16, 2013, 15:05 | Posted by Guy1977

    gplaskyyour review was not useful at all let alone cutting me down for stating the program was 4 1/2 months out of date at time of posting since you came along months after that.program does what it is suppose to do! debugging is a process that involves identifying and resolving or bypassing errors located in computer program code and will enable users to mitigate bugs.debugging tools for windows supports debugging of: applications, services, drivers, and the windows kernel, native 32-bit x86, native intel itanium, and native x64 platformsthough if your not comfortable using this you might start by running xp pro administrator tools/event logs which hook up to ms on-line help or can follow through into the forums for help. as for vista usage i will let someone else comment on how useful this maybe to them as well as information provided in the dumps for vista.wonder if will work on ms7?.regards
  • November 18, 2012, 08:02 | Posted by Thadeus1974

    a very good splitter
  • January 14, 2013, 12:56 | Posted by Thadeus1971

    the worst

Discover alternatives to and add-ons for driver i740 intel graphics card

Alternatives to driver i740 intel graphics card





race car driver fabri
download driver i740 intel graphics card
Size: 21 MB; Downloads: 2,162

hp scanjet xpa driver
download driver i740 intel graphics card
Size: 51 MB; Downloads: 2,806

video express drivers
download driver i740 intel graphics card
Size: 84 MB; Downloads: 1,675

driver i740 intel graphics card

Softonic's
Choice

  • 8.8
  • 8.9
User
  • 7.6
  • 7.5
Download

Addons for driver i740 intel graphics card

  • driver i740 intel graphics card doesn’t have any addons yet. Would you recommend any to us?

Sponsored links